the findings
3. ORGANISATIONS & GROUPS
This strand of the research focused on organisations and groups operating across Liverpool that play a role in the dance ecology. This included dance-specific organisations and groups, as well as those working more broadly across arts and culture, recognising their importance in commissioning, presenting work, supporting artist development and shaping opportunities for dance in the city.
The research explored experiences of funding, programming, collaboration and the strategic direction of dance within the wider cultural landscape. It sought to understand how organisations are currently operating, where they feel supported or constrained, and what is needed to strengthen the conditions for dance to thrive.
Overall, responses highlight a sector working with limited resources and under significant pressure. Many organisations described ongoing funding constraints that affect their ability to plan, programme and invest in long-term development. This has a direct impact on the range and consistency of work being produced, as well as on capacity to reach new audiences and communities.
A recurring theme was fragmentation. Respondents spoke about a lack of structural support and shared strategic direction, a situation that many felt had intensified following the closure of Merseyside Dance Initiative (latterly known as Together). Without a coordinating body or clear framework, collaboration between organisations is often informal and dependent on personal relationships rather than sustained systems.
There was strong support for a new lead dance organisation to advocate for and champion dance in Liverpool City Region and North West. Many respondents spoke about the void now being strongly felt, and emphasised that strategic leadership and coordination should not fall on individual artists and practitioners, nor be assumed by other organisations without the remit, capacity or resource to fulfil that role.
Additionally, there was broad support for the idea of high-quality new dance facilities in the future. Respondents highlighted the potential for such facilities to raise the profile of dance, attract companies to the city region, and provide flexible, well-equipped space that meets the needs of artists and practitioners. Many noted that existing arts venues often lack the capacity to offer regular, free or subsidised rehearsal and development space, or to present small and mid-scale work, due to their own programming commitments and/or venue sizes. A dedicated venue focused on this scale of work could create more opportunities for local artists and companies, attract regional, national and international work, and generate income to reinvest in strategic dance programmes and audience development.
Taken together, responses from organisations and groups point to the need for clearer leadership, better coordination and more sustainable support, alongside approaches that are inclusive, transparent and rooted in the realities of the sector.
RESPONDENTS
Arts Council England Funding
Yes, regularly funded: 33%
Yes, project funded: 14%
No: 53%
Liverpool City Council / Culture Liverpool Funding
Yes, regularly funded: 24%
Yes, project funded: 14%
No: 62%
Liverpool City Region Combined Authority Funding
Yes, regularly funded: 0%
Yes, project funded: 1%
No: 90%
HIGH-LEVEL KEY FINDINGS
1. Funding Challenges & Limited Financial Stability
Over half of respondents reported not receiving regular funding, including from Arts Council England, Liverpool City Council and other regional sources. This limits organisations’ ability to plan sustainably, expand programming or support independent artists, with smaller groups and grassroots initiatives particularly affected.
2. Capacity Pressures & Reliance on Short-Term Funding
Many organisations described operating with limited staff capacity and heavy reliance on short-term project funding. This restricts their ability to collaborate, invest in development, or respond flexibly to community need, even where demand exists.
3. Programming Gaps & Community Reach
Organisations deliver a wide range of activity, from community workshops to health-focused initiatives, but often feel unable to meet the full breadth of community need. Respondents identified gaps in provision for under-represented groups, including d/Deaf, disabled and neurodivergent communities, and highlighted the need for targeted support to reach these audiences.
4. Fragmented Landscape & Limited Strategic Coordination
There is a strong perception that Liverpool’s dance sector is fragmented, with insufficient strategic coordination, particularly following the closure of Merseyside Dance Initiative (MDI). Limited collaboration, restricted access to venues and a lack of shared infrastructure were commonly cited as barriers to sector growth.
5. Support for Collaborative, Experimental & Community-Centred Work
Respondents expressed interest in greater collaboration and strategic partnerships to support experimental and community-driven dance practice. Organisations working at a local level highlighted the value of this work, alongside the need for more sustainable funding and long-term partnerships to continue it effectively.
6. Interest in a Lead Organisation & Dedicated Dance Venue
Over half of respondents supported the idea of a new lead organisation to champion dance in Liverpool, alongside interest in a dedicated dance venue. However, this support is tempered by concerns about inclusivity, governance and whether limited resources might be diverted away from artist development, programming and community engagement.
7. Trust, Power & the Need for Inclusive Leadership
Underlying many responses was a concern about power imbalance within the sector. Respondents emphasised that any new leadership structures must be transparent, inclusive and representative, in order to rebuild trust and avoid reinforcing existing inequalities.
RECOMMENDATIONS
These recommendations reflect the opportunities identified by organisations and groups and suggest where targeted action could strengthen the structures and systems that support dance in Liverpool.
1. Establish A New Dance Development Organisation
A dedicated organisation is needed to provide strategic coordination, advocacy and support for Liverpool’s dance sector. Its role should be to unify activity across diverse dance forms and communities, work collaboratively with grassroots and established organisations, and represent dance within wider Liverpool City Region and North West cultural networks and partnerships.
2. Increase Funding Accessibility
Limited and inconsistent funding continues to restrict what organisations and artists are able to deliver. Greater access to funding from national and regional sources would support small dance groups and independent practitioners, with particular focus on community-led, inclusive and experimental work that broadens participation and diversity across the sector.
3. Strengthen Community Engagement
There is a clear opportunity to expand community-focused dance provision across the city region. Targeted programming, developed in partnership with local advocacy organisations, could better support d/Deaf, disabled and neurodivergent communities and help ensure dance activity is more inclusive and representative.
4. Develop Cross-Sector Funding & Support
Longer-term sustainability will depend on stronger collaboration beyond the dance sector alone. Partnerships across arts, health and education could unlock new funding opportunities and support programmes that deliver cultural, social and wellbeing benefits through dance.
5. De-risk Dance for Venues & Presenters
Many arts and cultural venues are open to programming more dance but face financial and operational risk in doing so. A time-limited, strategic investment programme could help address this by underwriting specific costs, supporting co-commissioning, providing marketing support or offering box office guarantees. This would enable venues to programme local, regional and international dance with greater confidence.
Crucially, this approach should be designed to build provision and rebuild audiences over time. As visibility, demand and confidence increase, the intention would be for venues to programme dance sustainably, without the need for ongoing de-risking support.
6. Explore Feasibility of a Dedicated Dance Venue
The evidence points to a longer-term need to improve the quality and availability of dance spaces in the city region. A feasibility study could help assess whether a dedicated dance venue is viable, taking into account community needs, existing infrastructure and potential funding sources.
Any future development should complement, rather than replace, existing venues, and consider how a facility could support performance, rehearsal, artist development and community engagement. Crucially, it should strengthen connections across the Liverpool City Region and form part of a wider, phased approach to dance infrastructure.
OTHER FINDINGS